Tuesday, August 21, 2012

The Expendables Vs Avengers

The Hulk Vs. Arnold-The Hulk's massive and incredibly strong but if you call the Devil a quire boy in his face and blow him back to hell no one can stop you.

Captain America Vs. Chuck Norris-Super Soldier Vs. A Mega God.................... Nough Said.

Thor Vs. Bruce Willis- Bruce because he's Unbreakable

Iron Man Vs Stallone????????????????????

Sunday, August 12, 2012

The Bourne Legacy

Groundbreaking Incompetence in Movie History 


Have you ever seen a bad movie and wonder to yourself, 'how the hell could they have made something so horrendous'? I constantly asked myself this question throughout my viewing of The Bourne Legacy. Just what the hell was going on through the production of this movie. What made things worse is that this film had great marketing and was coming off of a blockbuster franchise. You could not be so fortunate.

Tony Gilroy, even though he worked on the previous three Bourne movies, should not have helmed this movie. Stop giving action flick productions over to non-action directors. I hated all three of Michael Bay's Transformers, but this knows and understand how to direct action sequences and keeping pace very well. Michael Clayton and Duplicity are the two directing credits from Gilroy. The Bourne Legacy is just a plague of supreme boredom. In addition, this film's consistence of pointless, dragging scenes makes things worse. There's really only one decent action scene, which is shot to close, Marc Forster style. The climax is just a big 'f*ck you'.

Jeremy Renner stars as the new protagonist, Aaron Cross, foreshadowing just how bad Alex Cross will be. Screw you Tyler Perry. The movie opens similar to the first Bourne movie's opening with Jason Bourne floating, which is just the beginning of the film's obsession with incompetently connecting the first three films into this retarded storyline. The Saw franchise did a better job with intertwining it's storylines in it's franchise. They brought back every living character from the previous films just so they can say some two bit lines, walk from one area to the next or to just die off. For me this act kind of diminishes the value of the Jason Bourne trilogy a little. Why destroy these characters that should have nothing to do with this installment. Hey, Tony, your not Paul Greengrass pal.

Jeremy Renner was spectacular as Cross. Nothing against Bourne, but Jason never really felt human to me. He's just a stoic character thrown into a cool action movie, which is nothing against Damon, who's also great. Cross has a lot more personality. I guess it has more to do with the writing of the characters. Rachel Weiss should go back to the Mummy franchise. She's just a pretty face to me with no potential. Her character is even worse. So whiny. Rose Byrne should have gotten this role. I barely paid any attention to Norton, except for those huge sacks of bags under his eyes. Seriously dude, I believe they have Olay for that.

Amazingly, I didn't hate this movie. I really have no love it or hate it feeling at all. It's just dull as hell. There's a scene where Renner is just rock climbing in the snowy mountains and it means nothing!! Why the mountains? Why!? I must know this. In closing, this franchise, to quote Jericho, will never EVERRRRRRR be on the level of Bond. Many have tried and all have failed. Bond's cool and he doesn't need drugs or some super duper special training to be cool. And to the people who have seen this movie, so was this guy, Cross, a Universal Soldier or what.